A LAST EXIT FROM BROOKLYN?

Dearest Hubert,

Gil here.

I am tartly aware that it has been a long while since we have spoken or written but now that we are both dead perhaps the distances between us are lessened by our necrotic state. That black stone that you carried with you and that eventually carried you off came next to me. And yes, we did both invite that first unwelcome then hated entity into our lives but we were were we not ever prepared to live with the consequences of our own actions artistically as well as physically. Well do I recall those evenings at the Royal and the subsequent nights and early mornings in your '41 Dodge although for me the day I finally got rid of my own car and was on my way back to Brooklyn was my best.  

But I ramble. It's been so long. I did have something that I wanted to talk about with you. You remember those long talks we used to have? Of adverbs? Of the interchangeability of characters? Of Catholicism and Catholic writers? Do you remember my "eye disorder" that I feigned in homage to Joyce?  Good times – the start of better times. Perhaps you remember my obsession with O'Brien's blackly comic work? Enough of that – let's on to the matter germane. Allow me to explain.

When our own black stone brought me here across the Styx I was not quite prepared no I was prepared but I was not ready. The day before the crud in my lungs choked me to death I had had a notice from the good guys and gals at The Dalkey Archive that some guy out there in the grand wide shallows of interconnected nonsense that they call the internet has adopted me as a major character in a parody of my own parody. Some new writer was writing me – not some biography or hatchet job but a real novel – and I did so want to encourage him and peer into his creation. But the stone weighed heavy on my chest that day and the very next it crushed the last gasps of breath from me and all of my creation and brought me untimely on to your domain with things undone.

Since crossing into this shadey place I have boned up on this work of his. I am confused by it. It feels like some of those experimental works that the Brits were turning out in the 60s but doesn't so much as nod to the physical restraints that those brave explorers (Quinn, Johnson, Nye, Brooke-Rose, Heppenstall et al) were all mastered and bettered by – the internet has allowed him to lift some veils for the reader and crush some of the writer's traditional barriers. I confess I am not sure whether he is any good at all but you have to admire the size of his gonads for trying it. The boy's got the balls of an elephant. And he knows his onions but like I say I'm not sure …

OK, get on with it Gil! One of the things he's pointing up is the parallels between ourselves and Trellis and De Selby – now there's a turn up for the book – and me as Trellis! I like this because he plays with the greek word trellos and the character Trellis – the greek meaning mad or insane – sounds a lot like me. And then you become De Selby the mathematician (maybe he doesn't know as much about you as he should) and bizarre philosopher of Flann's inner darkness. It's a nice axis he has there.

He is inviting other writers to take part in the making or crafting of this text as he goes along. Also he has picked up on the bicycle molecule theory and is extending that outward into quantum physics (don't ask – just don't) and that, trust me, is a very neat idea. On top of all this he's taken my crap writer/ out of control character scenario and turned it loose on my own parodic novel. But the thing I really wanted to talk to you about – we've covered enough background now – is his exploration into the nature of that piercing relationship between fiction and reality and how they might be capable of reciprocal influence. We know that art can influence the physical world and clearly the "real" world leaks into art but what he is talking about is a more direct touching – think some of those sci-fi stories where the hero journeys back thru time to change the past and the ripple effects that that has on the then altered present produced from that now changed past. It's like an assignment for a creative writing class – "Your hero goes back in time and kills the young Hitler as he prepares to take the cloth – project the present that your hero returns to find.!"

You'll see why this concern me, how this concerns me, personally! If he is writing me what might he not do to me? And you!

For now I'll leave this with you – it has no doubt come as a shock to hear from me at all let alone that I am dead and have a quandry left back on the farther bank left unresolved. I shall be in touch soon.

Yours, ever (literally now)

Gil

PS – where can you get cigarettes here?

 

Tracey’s IP address

From: Tracey Root, CEO, IP trackers and IT forensics Ltd.

Dear Gilbert, it was really good to hear from you yesterday despite it being so long. And what an interesting problem you gave us. Luckily for you, and as I explained on the phone, we've recently taken on a new member of staff – an IT forensics expert – he fills out the team nicely and his IP skills are without peer. OK so he has done a lot of hacking on his own but that, as it turns out is very fortunate for all of us. Kevin is desperately short of social skills but I'm pleased to report that he's fixed your detective character's wagon good and all and you don't actually have to meet him even though he did say that Crete was somewhere he had never been (I ignored him and he soon shut up).

He said that the detective guy was quite smart and had been using an IP cloaking site to hide where he was coming form when he defaced your notebook site but that behind that he is or was using a static IP address connexion. Fortunately for you the IP anonymizer that he has been using was hosted on a Windows server and he, Kevin, was able to lay what he called a "sticky trap" there so that when he, DD, came back (a clever move of yours getting that pal of yours to provoke him) our Kev could unravel where he was (absolute and naked IP address)and from that access all of the transactions/message pairs that had passed between them. Well, to cut a long story, etc. we have blocked his I address and all of the range of IP addresses that his ISP uses from accessing any of you r sites. In short we've shut his routes into anything to do with you.

Kevin also worked out a pattern to the false IDs that he, DD, has been using and has pre-emptively blocked all IDs that conform to the model he was using. Kev reckons it'll take him a month to work out what has happened and if, and only, if he's a lot cleverer than he has so far demonstrated It'll take him another two to work out how to get around the barriers that Kev has erected. RESULT!

You can post whatever you like on any of the sites you listed for us with impunity but that the new notebook location (http://trellis.wordpress.com/) is particularly well guarded and commenting is locked off over there. Kev says if you have anything particularly sensitive then that's the place to put it. I'd trust Kevin's advice if I were you Gil. He knows his internet onions does Kev – he's an asset.

I hope that this is all in order and satisfies your concerns. No charge, of course, you're family darling and we don't take money from family.

Give our love to Abby

love and kisses

Trace

PS we'll be flying in on the 19th – look forward to our times with you.
PPS "we" does not include Kevin (I do not think he is allowed a passport anymore – i.e. since his last stretch)
This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have
received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete this e-mail.
The integrity and security of this transmission cannot be guaranteed. If verification is required
please request a hard-copy. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any
virus that may be enclosed in this transmission.

The Book of Dave

Radio4 -  book show – Chancey Other – what about DR – new book – The Book of Dave – OMG – is this related? is this the Dave? a religious text of the future – a cab driver – poor DR – lost his name (to RC) – CO stole his title – DR's factory series stolen by BBC itself – the hero has no name! Is DR involved or is it CO  or is this just paranoia?

The X file

Hi Finn old pal, it's been very quiet at your end and I suspect that your annual report has something to do with it. In any case I have been fairly quiet too because of familial commitments here. I have not been back to the lair of the Laz since last we spoke – I suspect that he may have noticed my last nocturnal incursion and battened the hatches down fairly firmly (I believe that certain port blockers and creative firewalls are becoming available these days for creatives but doubt he knows of them) . He cannot keep me out for long though. I have my ways in wedged open so to speak.

In fact I cannot dally too long over this email but I realised that you must be wondering how I got Laz to type an X. I shall satisfy your unvoiced curiosity forthwith:

when I turned up in his study he was writing a scene that featured a dialogue twixt my old creation DD and myself as the author of the Stew (his conceit is a deeply nested one). I observed the progress of the conversations and managed to insert into most of my "replies" to DD a mention of my cold sore (the one I have in physical life). I figured that if I kept talking about it – pointing to it – and asking for advice about it then at some time – and trust me it didn't take long – either DD himself or the Laz would have to mention either herpes simplex or Zovirax to shut me up and lo and behold they both fell for it – Laz recommending through DD Zovirax while the leaden DD went into some pseudo medical spiel about herpes simplex and its recurring habit. 

So you see, I have learnt how to manipulate the other, the fictive world that I inhabit, to my own advantage. Perhaps it is a minor victory but not, I suspect, a phyrric one. Watch these spaces for further developments. I hope to begin catch-up tomorrow.

a further explanation is forthcoming

Dear friend, dear Finn (I hope that I might now call you a friend) I was so pleased to have recognised your encoded missive and finally to have had feedback that the fact that I had not – obviously – made myself clear troubled me only a little. I have troubled myself more about it since then however. It is a matter of concern to me. I also now realise that some of my references may be foreign to you – foreign in its original unvarnished sense. I do not know whether you have read, in translation or in the original, any of the author or works from which I drew my original hypothesis. If not then please forgive for burdening you with such inapposite and irrelevant material. I seldom recall to myself when thinking or talking to you that your native tongue is not, of course, my own. In fact I am more aware of lingual divergence when thinking or talking to friends from the US than I am with you.

Having said all that I shall now attempt to explain myself properly.

In English we have a saying that "life imitates art" (source OFO'FWW – genius and sodomite – 1854-1900). This is a shortened form of the original ("Life imitates art far more than art imitates Life") but the kernel of meaning is right. And it is true you know. Only it is not an imitation. It is a seepage, no not a seepage, an active intervention in fact. It is what Flann O'Brien knew and hinted at in "At Swim Two Birds" and that he elaborated in more sinister fashion in the "Third Policeman" – or was it De Selby who knew it and he who used Flann as his mouthpiece? No matter for now. Great writers are ultimately solipsists creating the universes that they inhabit by their will and intellect. Not as lesser mortals suspect in some fictive fashion but in the physical world. Their creative urge pushes out beyond the page and into the outside world. Flann, or De Selby, sensed that this was so and even had some inkling of how it might work. But in those days quantum mechanics was young and barely comprehended – it should therefore come as no surprise that their hypothesis was pitched at the molecular level. In "The Third Policeman" it is explained how constant contact between the saddle of the bicycle and the policeman has irreversibly exchanged molecules of seat and policeman so that the policeman is now part bicycle and the bicycle part policeman. We know now that this is nonsensical: this interchange takes place at the quantum level – it is quarks and leptons that swap sides in their charmed and strange dance of spin and flavour. And if this is true for weak forces like bicycles and policemen how could it be denied that for strong forces like creativity and life itself it must also be true. This then is why life imitates (or appears to imitate) art. Art is a strong force and its quantum components cannot possibly be contained indefinitely. Life, at bottom is made – at least partly – by art. But at what cost we wonder? And what becomes of the quarks of life that end up in the work of art? You see my problem immediately – if this Laz character is good (and trust me he is) then his creation of me is in some way pushing its way into me and my life (hence the youthful spring in my step on the mornings after his literary excursions include me) then in what way will its impact be permanent? What would happen if he decided to kill me off? And finally, what part of my life of me is being left over there in his fictive me – can I do without it?

There is one more thing that I want to discuss with you if you will indulge me: last night I went to his study while he was writing me (I have explained how that works somewhere haven't I?) in order specifically to inspect his typewriter. I had been entranced by this device since first I saw it on the huge partners desk beside the four shoe boxes. It was immediately both familiar and magical. For days I have wondered about it – aloud and in secret musings. It was only yesterday that it hit me – it is my old typewriter – the one I wrote my earliest works on: when publisher's advances would not stretch to computers. I bought it when at college from a small pawnshop in Trellis Street around the corner from my then digs (although I cannot for the life of me recall having ever parted myself from it) and it was a trusty friend all through the drafts and fair copies of those faltering first works. It seemed to me sometimes in those dark dry blocked days that it even helped me out sometimes; drawing my fingers pecking towards particular clusters of letters that would then assemble themselves into a well turned phrase. As now, I had no real muse in the very concrete supernatural way that Johnson did, and my own little conceit was that this typewriter had once been owned by a great writer and had learnt its own writing skills that it could teach me. Would teach if I would only learn from it. The countless hours I spent at that machine!

Anyway, to get back to last night. I went to his study to check. My own typewriter had a unique defect, as I am told do all typewriters. The lower case X (x) had not been cast correctly and the ink from the ribbon would always smudge around the cruciform leaving a tell-tale thickening in the middle of the letter-form. I had to check for myself whether his typewriter had the same malformation (another time I shall tell you how I managed to make sure that he would have to type an x); whether his typewriter was my typewriter. It is.

Feeling emboldened by my discovery I dared more last night than ever before. When the Laz left the room to make coffee I peeked into one of the shoe boxes and bizarrely I discovered there a potted history of that very typewriter. Supported by a private investigator's invoice and various supporting documentation it proves he has traced the full history of my typewriter!

Finn my friend, for now I really think of you as a friend, I have unburdened enough for one day, these nocturnal wanderings tire me – I shall conclude this epistle tomorrow but rather than wait I shall send this first part winging its way to you and hope against hope that it is sufficiently coherent to warrant your attention.

For now I remain
your exhausted friend

GilbertS
(to be continued … )

Finn again

Gilbert, I still haven't figured out your theory, or if it was yours
at all, but of some other entity at some level wanting be to be
written into the fabric. I intended to give your thoughts some time
today, but I'm still laying out a certain annual report.

I think Jaakko Hintikka has thumbed your records. He has said that in
describing a possible world we are free to choose the universe of
discourse it is designed to apply to. Thus possible worlds are always
so called 'small worlds,’ One Umberto was weaving the same plot: "The
same holds for fictional worlds: in order to lead its readers to
conceive of a possible fictional world, a text must invite them to a
relatively easy 'cosmological” task'."

Other than this I know not by now. I must protect my own autonomy.

Finn
–

The email that may have been tampered with and my response

Finn my saviour – if Finn you be,
I recently received the following email and I am desperately hoping that it was from you. The Mr Nylon signature threw me.

You were correct to suspect that my email was being intercepted. I know not by whom but I have set up a new email address that is safe: gilberts@id-ds.com – please use this address in future and come back to me soon. I have further evidence that my original hypothesis is true but I would appreciate some feed-back.

Yours

GilbertS

Sorry, Gilbert, somebody hijacked your message.
Whoever you are, forward this to Gilbert, please.

Thank you.

Mr. Nylon
–
———————————————-

> Papa of Arus? Mr Nylon? You are messing with my headspace guy
>
>
> Can I clarify ?
>
>
——————————————-
> Dear Papa of Arus
> I have lost track completely.
>
> Mr. Nylon
> Dear Papa of Arus
> I have lost track completely.
>
> Mr. Nylon
——————————————–

The eMails I sent to Jill and Finn

Hi Finn, long time no speak. We all really enjoyed the party and I only wish that I had been able to spend longer talking with you but what with your duties as host and me having constantly to look out for what the FarmTwins were up to – it just didn’t work out. Hope you and the family are well and that the studies are going well. As you are aware from the blog I am having some very strange things happening right now. The auteur gave me permission to write to you in your capacity as the leading European expert in modern interactive fiction and post modern texts. He also gave me your email address.

I have been receiving, of late nocturnal visitations, from an old and discarded fictional character of mine and these visitations or apparitions are accompanied by a regression of my apparent age – i.e. the day after one of these visits I look and feel much younger than my actual age would support. The last three nights have been visit free and my apparent age is back to “normal” and in this respite I have been able to put together an hypothesis that covers most of the observable “facts” in a coherent fashion. I would like to outline that hypothesis and ask for your thoughts on it if you could spare the mental capacity and the time.

I believe that another author has taken up my discarded character (Dick Detective has more or less confirmed this point) and is writing another version of one of my old books that featured him. Moreover, I believe that this new author is including me into the rewrite. The fact that both Dick and I are – when we meet – both younger than we were when we originally worked together and in fact younger than either of us in any of the books in which he featured leads me to suspect that the new author (known tentatively as the Laz or the Lez – I may yet uncover his real identity for male he most certainly is) is writing a prequel section. This would account for the age discrepancies.

I am likewise swayed to believe that the new author is writing exclusively at night – hence the exclusively nocturnal nature of the visitations. It would therefore seem that he has not written for the past three night. Either that or he has only been writing one of us. He must – I sense – write both of us to allow a visitation. In that case it is remotely possible that he has been writing my character (the aforementioned DD) but not me in the last three nights (if my reverse ageing is a consequence of his writing me young then he cannot have written me for 3 days (or nights)).

I appreciate that this might seem a little far fetched to persons less experienced than yourselves with post modernism and interactive texts but I feel that I need some validation that this could be the case. And your view is? Does this potentially stack up? What do you think?

I am currently undertaking some allied research into quantum mechanical theories of texts that may yet shed more light if not heat on my hypothesis (Flann’s Theory) and will let you know how that works out but for now I’d appreciate your input. Please help if you are able since this conundrum is in danger of derailing my real life.

Yours in anticipation

Gilbert S

PS – Finn – if you have an email address for Jill Walker please forward this to her with you commendations – I fear my address for her may be either ancient or redundant or (worse yet) fictional. Cheers.

Hi Jill, I have read your thesis and respect greatly your theories about modern interactive texts. I have a question upon which I would greatly appreciate your opinion.

I have been receiving, of late nocturnal visitations, from an old and discarded fictional character of mine and these visitations or apparitions are accompanied by a regression of my apparent age – i.e. the day after one of these visits I look and feel much younger than my actual age would support. The last three nights have been visit free and my apparent age is back to “normal” and in this respite I have been able to put together an hypothesis that covers most of the observable “facts” in a coherent fashion. I would like to outline that hypothesis and ask for your thoughts on it if you could spare the mental capacity and the time.

I believe that another author has taken up my discarded character (Dick Detective has more or less confirmed this point) and is writing another version of one of my old books that featured him. Moreover, I believe that this new author is including me into the rewrite. The fact that both Dick and I are – when we meet – both younger than we were when we originally worked together and in fact younger than either of us in any of the books in which he featured leads me to suspect that the new author (known tentatively as the Laz or the Lez – I may yet uncover his real identity for male he most certainly is) is writing a prequel section. This would account for the age discrepancies.

I am likewise swayed to believe that the new author is writing exclusively at night – hence the exclusively nocturnal nature of the visitations. It would therefore seem that he has not written for the past three night. Either that or he has only been writing one of us. He must – I sense – write both of us to allow a visitation. In that case it is remotely possible that he has been writing my character (the aforementioned DD) but not me in the last three nights (if my reverse ageing is a consequence of his writing me young then he cannot have written me for 3 days (or nights)).

I appreciate that this might seem a little far fetched to persons less experienced than yourselves with post modernism and interactive texts but I feel that I need some validation that this could be the case. And your view is? Does this potentially stack up? What do you think?

I am currently undertaking some allied research into quantum mechanical theories of texts that may yet shed more light if not heat on my hypothesis (Flann’s Theory) and will let you know how that works out but for now I’d appreciate your input. Please help if you are able since this conundrum is in danger of derailing my real life.

Yours in anticipation

Gilbert S